One thing I'll never understand about Canada: Why do you mix letters and numbers in your postal codes? The postal code for Quebec is: J0N 1P0.

Is this l33t speak time? How often does 0 get confused with O?

Why can't you keep it simple with numbers???

Posted by roy on January 3, 2007 at 01:55 PM in Ramblings | 9 Comments

Related Entries

Want to comment with Tabulas?. Please login.

Comment posted on January 4th, 2007 at 01:32 AM
I presume you've noticed your NR reseller account (aka NeoPages + some other things) has been suspended. (When) is that going to be fixed?
Comment posted on January 4th, 2007 at 02:53 AM
I have a phone conference with a tech tomorrow, I was told: "The account in question has become suspended due to multiple accounts specifically under your Reseller appear to have been exploited and leaking out into other accounts."

Basically, it'll be back whenever NetworkRedux lets us come back (if they do, for some reason I have a feeling they won't)
Comment posted on January 3rd, 2007 at 09:21 PM
Too much trouble to question. Just criticize. Straight to the point.
Comment posted on January 3rd, 2007 at 07:52 PM
It just allows for expansion. Our system is sort of a cross between the UK (who has a terribly fussy and strange system) and yours (quite concise).

Ours allows for about 7 million different codes, of which we use 800 000. The theoretical maximum would be 10^3x26^3, but some letters are skipped because of their similarity to numbers (D, F, I, O*, Q, and U), and some aren't used in various places.

Having more postal codes allows mail to be sorted into very small geographical areas. It's not the same as per-locality. The first three digits designate a wide area (the distribution centre) and the last three designate a very localised one, typically one block. This is probably why Canada Post is so slow.

Postal codes are very interesting to me.

* O is used in one postal code: The North Pole, H0H 0H0. Kids write to Santa and their letters are responded to in the same language they're written. I think the mail actually goes to Ottawa.
Comment posted on January 3rd, 2007 at 08:45 PM
Wow, I just learned a lot. This could be the most useful comment ever posted (congrats).

I didn't know they didn't use letters that resemble numbers; I guess that makes things more acceptable.

Is there a consistent pattern in numbers vs.letter usage? Will the first character of a postal code always be a letter? Is there any geographical significant to the letters/numbers? That is to say, will Montreal have a closer postal code (mathematically) to Quebec as opposed to Vancouver?

I guess if the point is to have a lot of available postal codes for precision, it makes a lot of sense to use letters in there.

OH THERE'S ALWAYS A REASON, ISN'T THERE CANADA?????????????

(could the 800 000 / 7 000 000 usage indicate some secret plan by canada to take over the world?)
Comment posted on January 3rd, 2007 at 09:11 PM
The first letter is always a letter. It designates the province (or area; Montreal has H to itself while all of Alberta has T). They work east-west, so Montreal’s H would be adjacent to G or something in the rest of Qu&eaigu;bec. The next two break it down into districts.

Yeah, efficiency was probably the idea, but Canada Post isn’t exactly known for its speediness.

The other 6.2 million are reserved for the USA and Mexico in the event of our conquest.
Comment posted on January 3rd, 2007 at 09:14 PM
I apologise for my strange whitespace and mistyped special character.
Comment posted on January 3rd, 2007 at 05:18 PM
It's solely to annoy Americans =p

Naw, I dunno why it's like that but it's pretty simple. As far as I know all postal codes are letter,number,letter space number,letter,number. It's really not too hard to grasp, you know like the metric system ;p
Comment posted on January 3rd, 2007 at 02:53 PM
We're just so complex.