i've noticed something with MT ... i haven't googled this anywhere, so i really don't have any *valid* claims to back this all up, but MT.cgi seems to be *very* server intensive.

i monitor my servers quite constantly nowadays (i usually leave the TOP command on in putty while I work and toggle). i always notice a few sites on the np.net servers using MT ... and MT.cgi always is on the process list for at least 40 seconds eating at least 50% of memory resources, boosting my load averages up by at least 25%. of course, i'm not sure what the person is doing - perhaps they're rebuilding their whole database or something. i don't know.

then again, perl has never been known to be a non-cpu intensive language - there was a distinct reason everyone moved away from perl-based bulletin boards for PHP/mySQL.

this makes me start to doubt the viability of typepad. of course, they are only going to be paid accounts ... but logically i cannot see more than 50 high-traffic sites per server for typepad (i pulled that number out of my ass) ... i make no valid claims for tabulas; i know this thing is a memory hog as well with shitty SQL queries and such (i will clean those up before 1.0 hopefully).

but i guess what i'm going back to is the fact that LJ focuses more on the memory consumption aspects rather than user interface or user features, which is a damn good thing. of course, i'm focusing more on designs and UI than memory consumption ... and typepad... well i don't know what typepad is focusing on. ok. enough of that ...
Posted by roy on June 19, 2003 at 09:45 AM | 2 Comments

Related Entries

Comment posted on June 19th, 2003 at 04:25 PM
wtf.... I say conjunction junction, what is your function

Daniel (guest)

Comment posted on June 19th, 2003 at 12:20 PM
i haven't used MT but i know a lot of folks who use it. and most of the time i notice that their pages are very slow to bring up. sometimes TOO slow. so yeah, it does seem to bog down the servers somehow....

Want to comment with Tabulas?. Please login.