Dubai Firm Backs Out of U.S. Ports Deal.

Recently, a Dubai firm launched a bid to buyout a London firm which is responsible for six US ports. The xenophobic US government threatened to block the deal, while Bush threatened to veto any action from Congress that would block the deal. The concern of our short-sighted representatives in Congress, of course, was that because a Dubai firm owned the company, that this would somehow facilitate terrorism.

The two-facedness of our Congress makes me so angry. On one hand, they espouse the values of free markets and how important opening up trade with new countries is for peace. Then they go and threaten to block a bill based on racism.

I can't believe lifelong politicians are so short-sighted; what kind of message are we really sending the world? We're acting like spoiled untrusting children who want the world to respect us while we act like little brats. Given the battering of our national prestige, you'd think our government would be making efforts at amending our relations rather than driving a big, shiny stake between them.

I would have liked to see a showdown between Bush and Congress - it would have been nice (for once) to see Bush out of step with the Republicans and to make a stand on his own.

In general, the way our government is approaching other nations scares me. We're quickly turning into a nation where we fear any foreigners (good thing we're not a nation of immigrants!) and assume they're here to do something evil. It seems that people, when given a voice, want to make America into some exclusive club where nobody can enter ... but hey, we're "protecting" our way of life!

Ugh.

Since I figure nobody is reading this, I'll write up a few snippets on my personal political views on various issues.

Abortion: I never feel comfortable making decisions about women, so I'm glad I'm really not in any position of power to do so. Basically I've come to the conclusion that abortion should be legal, but that I personally don't believe in it. If confronted with a woman who I knew had an abortion, I would honestly probably think lesser of that person. I really don't like the way Americans are starting to look to the government as some sort of moral authority figure - that was never the role of government, that is the role of church. The role of the government is not to make our moral decisions for us, but to provide security for our nation (both internationally and domestically) as well as enforce the social contracts among the people; the government must strive to protect the rights of the minorities and to make sure the playing field is equal (on a legal basis).

Drugs: Why is it a crime to do drugs? I can understand if Congress is acting out with some laws in some twisted scheme to protect the cotton industry, but why are we throwing citizens in jail for doing drugs in the privacy of their own home? At the very most, drugs should results in a monetary fine (the same way we penalize speeding) - I see them both in a similar light. Both are conscious decisions one makes, and both could threaten the lives of others in certain circumstances (in fact, I'd probably gander that speeders are more of a danger than recreational drug users). Much like abortion, my personal beliefs differ here - I've never taken drugs (although I've been in the company of various friends who have) simply because I don't want to. But I see absolutely no right for the government to throw people in jail because they made a conscious decision about something they want to do. In any case, why not legalize marijuana and tax it? The US government could make some much-needed revenue lost from the tobacco industry *and* people could toke up in the privacy of their own homes. Who exactly is losing here? Oh right, those nuts who think that the government should be the overriding moral authority in our nation.

Immigation: Why even restrict immigation? People have this messed up notion that if we allow a bunch of people who are willing to come in and work at lower wages, that we somehow aren't "protecting our way of life." This is tangentially related to the US' fascination with "protecting" our airline and steel industries against the evil conspiring nations who are teaming up to destroy "critical" US industries. I think Maddox says it best in regards to immigation (I'm paraphrasing, he's not really not working looking forreal): "If a immigrant thinks he can come in and do my job better at a lower wage, bring it on!" The border patrols in Arizona and New Mexico are flat-out stupid. If Latin Americans want to come into this country, work at a honest wage to make their own lives better, who are we to stop them?

The one overriding desire that all humans share is our longing to be loved, to have children, and to give them a good future. If all nations in the world had a standard of living even remotely close to that of the US, there would be a LOT less conflicts (well, besides the fact that the US is run by a bunch of arrogant pricks who want to run the world, and the fact that nationalistic pricks like the Chinese and Koreans would start wars over pride). Nations only go to war when they have something to lose, so let's give them something that's not worth losing (economic self-worth).

I guess in a sense that last sentence is where I stand when it comes to any geopolitical issues. I do believe in the value of the free market (I am an econ major from a very liberal school), and I do think that history tends to back up the idea that rich countries are less likely to go to war with one another... Thomas Friedman's "Golden Arches" theory still holds true (the theory states that two nations with McDonalds franchises have never gone to war... obviously there's a logical fallacy here [does the McDonald's franchise prevent war from happening, or does McDonald's simply pick nations that are more stable], but the concept is still there).

Ok, this is far too much incoherent rambling for one night. I went out with Han and Borst earlier, and I still think I'm working off some of that buzz ... I know, I'm a lightweight.

Happy Friday, y'all. Go Heels!

Currently listening to: Britney Spears - Toxic
Posted by roy on March 10, 2006 at 03:18 AM in Ramblings | 6 Comments

Related Entries

Want to comment with Tabulas?. Please login.

Comment posted on March 10th, 2006 at 05:56 PM
Dubai: I agree with Bert, the politicians are just reacting to pressure from their generally uninformed constituants.
Abortion: I agree with you. When men start having babies they can talk about whether abortion is right for the person carrying the baby.
Drugs. Yes, make the legal and sold in stores and tax the hell out of them (like cigarettes). Drug will always be around, so we might as well have some control over them and get some money out of their sale. And when drugs are legal (like liquor) you have less of a criminal element involved.
Immigration: I think I may sort of agree with you toward the end. Unfettered immigration may result in waves of people coming in that had no skills or even knew what they were getting into. They would probably end up on social welfare programs and that would really affect our already-hurting economy. I do think that the best way to fight this problem is to help improve the conditions in their own country so they won't want to leave.

Thanks for the interesting post.

Steve Cory (guest)

Comment posted on March 10th, 2006 at 01:17 PM
Hey Roy,

While I was on the <a href="http://stevecory.blogspot.com/2006/02/jewel-of-seas-winter-2006.html">Jewel of the Seas</a> my son Kyle was at Lavar's house. He was drinking, dropped some mushrooms, and ate ecstasy (sp). He left Lavar's freaking out and no one there could/would stop him. He near missed the Security Guard on the way out of the Royal Park Apts. The SG called the Carrboro Police. They arrived and couldn't find Kyle. So they worked a deal with Lavar, that he would have to conjure up Kyle, or else. Still haven't heard what the "or else" was but he's a well known dealer. Matt, one of Lavars' minions, went to my house, pulled Kyle out of bed and put him in Matt’s car. Kidnap style. Kyle was fighting with Matt all the way back to the Royal Park apts. When Matt got there with Kyle, he shoved Kyle out of the car near the officers. The police then tried to apprehend Kyle while he was still swinging and fighting. Kyle was so out of it he hit Champion and Metz. They handcuffed him and brought him to the poky where Kyle received several more bruises. Eventually, they brought Kyle to spend the night at UNC Hospital and ran up $1600 w/o being insured. In the morning they brought him to the Orange County jail and he spent the day there. A husband of one of my friends bailed him out with a $2500 lien on his house. I was way far away. I don't understand recreational drugging. I do understand that many people are in pain or are angry and need some release, but drugging only puts off the trouble that they unfortunately must face. I think dealers are sleazy and take advantage of the innocent and vulnerable. I see how easy it is for depressed people to abuse them. Kyle will have to go to court soon to find out how much more of his life will be ruined.

GO HEELS!!
Comment posted on March 10th, 2006 at 10:50 AM
opposing dubai is good for a few senators and congressmen's political image. Makes hillary look like she's supporting the security of the country without supporting Bush.

these people suck. And yes.. republicans do this just as much as democrats. John McCain most of all.

Anton (guest)

Comment posted on March 10th, 2006 at 09:20 AM
Roy, way to unload and share your thoughts on politics and social issues. Not all of the Dubai oppostition is racism - I'm against the Dubai deal because the administration didn't follow it's own law in vetting the sale, and because of my discomfort with the UAE's past relationships with terrorists. And as for the Golden Arches, I cherished my time in Vanuatu, which doesn't have a McDonald's, though it did have a burger joint run by the American Jill.
Comment posted on March 10th, 2006 at 12:24 PM
Hey Anton!

I haven't kept up with the deal too much through the blogospheres, so I'm a bit dark on some of the nuances of the situation. I was unaware of any laws not being followed in this case... I'll have to look that up.
Comment posted on March 10th, 2006 at 08:42 AM
What's happened to me and/or you?!? I agreed with just about everything you said in that post... =)